|
COMBI Bulletin Board
![]() SWLS Forum
![]() Re-establishing rapport
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Re-establishing rapport |
|
markus9 Junior Member |
Some patients take these questions in the wrong way, and can be very upset that you're asking them to rate a statement like..."In most ways, my life is close to my ideal." This is especially true for patients who are one to two years post injury. How should an interviewer re-establish rapport after administering the SWLS? IP: Logged |
|
jwright Administrator |
I am posting this reply for John Corrigan, PhD Dear Markus9, I have been waiting to see if anyone else responded to your inquiry. "I'm somewhat surprised by this - it has never been an issue with I'd have to say that the negative experience you had with the SWLS --John Corrigan IP: Logged |
|
debbieburdsall Junior Member |
In my 10 years experience as an interviewer, I have found that more cognitively intact individuals do in fact have difficulty with the SWLS questions. Individuals that lack insight into their disability may not find these questions as emotionally laden. In the case of the TBI National Database, caregivers may have more issues with the SWLS questions due a greater level of insight into how their loved one's injury has impacted his or her life. Additionally, in my experience, the SWLS questions are not taken lightheartedly, except in cases where the individual is severely impaired. IP: Logged |
|
Mary Lou Gustafson Member |
I would agree with Debbie. If the individual is cognitively more intact, many times it takes longer and is more frustrating for them to answer the SWLS statements. This is particularly true for significant others, especially those with more education. I have had a few say to me, "What kind of questions are these?", and they are generally irritated. The question was, however, "How does one re-establish rapport after asking such questions?" Our center is now beginning our 11th year of follow-up and the patients are still willing to complete the questions. I think it is important to make resources and support available to them both at the time of the interview as well as throughout the year. IP: Logged |
|
MartyF Junior Member |
I guess I have partial agreement. I haven't seen anger/frustration directed towards interviewers. What I have seen is a incredulousness with the last question about changing almost nothing. Some find this question to be absurd for us to ask, (and us perhaps to be a little out of touch to be asking). This goes away, however, by informing these subjects that in fact there are a variety of responses to this question - not everyone feels the way that they do. In the several hundred SWLS' that we have administered, I'm only aware of a couple of cases in which subjects who felt that the answer was obvious that they felt strongly that they would change something (their trauma), responded on the other end of the spectrum - due to their lack of respect for the question. Because of the mixed response that these subjects gave, e.g.; "Are you kidding? My life was messed up in a single moment. Sure I wouldn't change anything, I strongly agree", a VERY brief query resulted in a congruent response. IP: Logged |
|
Barnard Junior Member |
If you have published any artickels on this subject, please correspond with me! Greatings A.J. Barnard Fptajb@puknet.puk.ac.za IP: Logged |
All times are PT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.