|
|
|
O-Log
Frequently Asked Questions
|
- When
can the O-Log be performed?
- Can
the O-Log be administered to people who are unable to vocalize?
- Could
the O-Log be used over the phone?
- Could
the O-Log be used by family members?
- Should
I use the O-Log or the GOAT?
1.
When can the O-Log be performed?
At UAB, the O-Log is typically administered during morning rounds,
but it can be done at any time. In fairness to patients, it is likely
best to administer the O-Log at the same time during the day when
repeated administrations take place. The O-Log can be used daily
or at intervals of several days.
2.
Can the O-Log be administered to people who are unable to vocalize?
The O-Log is not dependent on vocal responses. The examiner can
rely on written responses or mouthing of responses using the established
3 point scoring protocol. Fortunately, all responses to the O-Log
are brief. If the person can provide a yes/no response the recognition
format can be used.
3.
Could the O-Log be used over the phone?
This has not been done at UAB, but there is no reason that the O-Log
could not be administered over the phone, provided the patient can
respond vocally. There are no non-vocal motor abilities required
by the O-Log and it is a brief scale.
4.
Could the O-Log be used by family members?
A few family members at UAB have requested training in administering
the O-Log so that progress could be documented following discharge
from acute rehabilitation. This has not proven to be a problem.
5.
Should I use the O-Log or the GOAT?
If you are working with a patient who has not experienced a TBI,
the O-Log is more appropriate. For those with TBI it is a matter
of personal choice. Both scales are effective in measuring orientation.
The O-Log has the benefit of brevity, objectivity, and clarity in
scoring. The GOAT has the benefit of a long history of research
and clinical application. For the severely injured, the O-Log should
be considered strongly because of the emphasis on essential information.
For the mildly injured, the GOAT may be more appropriate given its
track record and the questions asked.
|